{"id":625,"date":"2017-11-20T18:04:54","date_gmt":"2017-11-20T18:04:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/?page_id=625"},"modified":"2026-10-06T14:11:25","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T21:11:25","slug":"representative-publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/representative-publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"

2020 – Present<\/h2>\n

Perkins, L., Feldman, N. H., & Lidz, J. (2026). <\/span>\u201cMind the gap: Learning the Surface Forms of movement dependencies.\u201d<\/a> Language.<\/span><\/p>\n

Perkins, L., Ying, Y., Williams, A., & Lidz, J. (2026). <\/span>Representations of Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies Feed Verb Learning in Infancy<\/a>. Developmental Science.<\/span><\/p>\n

Perkins, L., & Hunter, T. (2026). <\/span>Modeling regularization in language acquisition as noise-tolerant grammar selection<\/a>. Cognition, 268, 106352.<\/span><\/p>\n

Peperkamp, S., & Sundara, M. (2026). <\/span>Reassessing the labial-coronal asymmetry in infants\u2019 discrimination of medial consonants<\/a>. Language Development Research, 6(1).<\/span><\/p>\n

Steffman, J., & Sundara, M. (2026). <\/span>Is perceptual learning of segmental phonotactics talker-specific? <\/a>Journal of Memory and Language, 148, 104731.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Sundara, M., & Breiss, C. (2026). How infants learn segmental phonotactics in their native language: Integrating insights from machine learning and adult and infant experiments. <\/a><\/span>Cognition<\/em>, 273, 106525.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Yu, K., Khan, S. D., & Sundara, M. (2026). Phonological choices drive f0 range expansion and lengthening in Bengali and English infant-directed speech<\/a>. <\/span>Languages<\/em>, 11(4), 68.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Breiss, C., Hayes, B.,\u00a0Sundara M.,\u00a0& Johnson, M. (2025) How suffixes are learned in infancy<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span>Cognitive Science.<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n

Sol\u00e1-Llonch, E., &\u00a0Sundara, M.\u00a0(2025). Young infants\u2019 sensitivity to vowel harmony is independent of language experience<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span>Infant Behavior and Development,\u00a0<\/i>78, 102032<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Liang, K., & Sundara, M. (2025). Infants discover English suffixes allomorph by allomorph<\/a>. Journal of Child Language<\/em>, 1\u201310.<\/p>\n

Mayer, C., Kondur, A., & Sundara, M. (2025). The UCI Phonotactic Calculator: An online tool for computing phonotactic metrics<\/a>. Behavior Research Methods<\/em>, 57(218), 1\u201317.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., & Frota, S. (2025). English-learning infants\u2019 developing sensitivity to intonational contours<\/a>. Languages<\/em>, 10(7), 148<\/p>\n

Abbas, A., Xu, L., & Sundara, M. (2025). Morphological Structure in the Arabic Mental Lexicon: Productivity and Priming Effects in Nominal and Verbal Patterns<\/a>. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 47.<\/p>\n

Perkins, L., V. Mateu, & N. Hyams. (2025). 28-month-olds use inferred thematic relations to bootstrap intransitive verb meanings<\/a>. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 561\u2013574. Cascadilla Press<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Perkins, L., Knowlton, T., Williams, A., & Lidz, J. (2025). \u201cThematic content, not number matching, drives syntactic bootstrapping<\/a>.\u201d Language Learning and Development<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Jo, J., & Sundara, M. (2024).<\/span>Remote collection of language samples from 3-year-olds.<\/span>Journal of Child Language,\u00a0<\/i>1\u201314. Advance online publication<\/em>.\u00a0<\/span>doi.org\/10.1017\/S0305000924000643<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Jo, J.,\u00a0Sundara, M.,\u00a0Breiss, C. (2024). Predicting language outcomes at age 3 using individual differences in morphological segmentation in infancy.<\/span>\u00a0Infant Behavior and Development,\u00a0<\/i>77, 102001,\u00a0<\/span>doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infbeh.2024.102001<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

E. Khlystova, A. Williams, J. Lidz & L. Perkins. (2024). \u201cVisual perception supports 4-place event representations: A case study of <\/a><\/span>Trading<\/span>.\u201d <\/span>Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Volume 46 (CogSci 2024)<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Katsuda, H. & Sundara, M. (2024). English-learning infants developing sensitivity to vowel phonotactic cues to word segmentation.<\/a> Developmental Science.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins<\/span>, <\/b>T. Knowlton, A. Williams, & J. Lidz. (2024). \u201cThematic content, not number matching, drives syntactic bootstrapping.\u201d <\/a><\/span>Language Learning and Development<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mateu, V.E & Sundara, M. (2024). Constraints on acceleration in bilingual development: Evidence from word segmentation by Spanish-learning infants. <\/a><\/span>Behavioral Sciences<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n

Xu, L., Sol\u00e1-Llonch, E., Wang, H., & Sundara, M.\u00a0<\/strong>(2024).\u00a0<\/strong>A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages<\/a>.\u00a0Mental Lexicon<\/em><\/p>\n

Khlystova, E., Chong, A.J., & Sundara, M. (2023). Phonetic variation in English infant-directed speech: A large-scale corpus analysis.<\/a>\u00a0Journal of Phonetics\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

L. Perkins\u00a0& J. Lidz. \u201cBehavioral Acquisition Methods with Infants<\/a>.\u201d (2023). J. Sprouse (ed.),\u00a0The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Syntax<\/i>.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins\u00a0& T. Hunter. \u201cNoise-tolerant learning as selection among deterministic grammatical hypotheses<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0(2023).\u00a0Proceedings of the 6th<\/sup>\u00a0meeting of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (SCiL 2023)<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Steffman, J., & Sundara, M. (2023). Short-term exposure alters adult listeners\u2019 perception of segmental phonotactics. <\/a><\/span>JASA-Express Letters<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
V. Mateu,\u00a0L. Perkins,\u00a0<\/b>& N. Hyams. (2023). \u201cLearning unaccusativity: Evidence for split intransitivity in child Spanish<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0Proceedings of the 97th<\/sup>\u00a0Linguistics Society of America Annual Meeting<\/i>.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Steffman, J., & Sundara, M. (2023). Disentangling the role of biphone probability from neighborhood density in the perception of nonwords<\/a>.\u00a0Language & Speech,\u00a0<\/em>May 9; 238309231164982.<\/p>\n

S. Maitra &\u00a0L. Perkins.\u00a0\u201cFiltering input for learning constrained grammatical variability: The case of Spanish word order.<\/a>\u201d (2023).\u00a0Proceedings of the 6th<\/sup>meeting of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (SCiL 2023)<\/i>.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M.,\u00a0(Publication date: 2023).\u00a0The speech perception of bilingual infants.<\/a> In Amengual, M. (Ed.)\u00a0The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology<\/em>, Cambridge University Press, Boston: MA<\/p>\n

Mayer, C., Kondur, A., & Sundara, M. (2022). UCI Phonotactic Calculator (Version 0.1.0) [Computer software].\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.7443706<\/a><\/p>\n

L. Perkins, N. H. Feldman, & J. Lidz. (2022). The power of ignoring: Filtering input for argument structure acquisition.<\/a> Cognitive Science, 46 (1) e13080.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Zhou, Z.L., Breiss, C., Katsuda, H., & Steffman, J. (2022). Infants\u2019 developing sensitivity to native language phonotactics: A meta-analysis<\/a>. Cognition<\/p>\n

Sundara, M. (2022). Development of speech perception and production in bilingual preverbal infants. In Goldstein, B. (Ed.) Bilingual Language Development in Language Development and Disorders in Spanish-English speakers<\/a>, 3rd Edition. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore: MD.<\/p>\n

Mateu, V.E. & Sundara, M. (2022). Spanish input accelerates bilingual infants\u2019 segmentation of English words<\/a>. Cognition, 218, 104936. doi: 10.1016\/j.cognition.2021.104936<\/p>\n

Kim, Y. J., & Sundara, M. (2021). 6-month-olds are sensitive to English morphology<\/a>. Developmental Science, 24(4), e13089. Advance online publication.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., White, J., Kim, Y.J. & Chong, A.J. (2021) Stem similarity modulates infants\u2019 acquisition of phonological alternations<\/a>. Cognition, 209, 104573 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2020.104573<\/p>\n

L. Perkins & J. Lidz. (2021) Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.<\/a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118 (41) e2026469118; DOI: 10.1073\/pnas.2026469118.<\/p>\n

Byers-Heinlein, K., Bergmann, C., Black, A., Brown, A., Julia Carbajal M., Durrant, S., Fennell, C. T., Fi\u00e9vet, A., Frank, M., Gampe, A., Gervain, J., Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hamlin, J. K., Havron, N., Hernik, M., Kerr, S., Killam, H., Klassen, K., Kosie J. E., Kov\u00e1cs, \u00c1., Lew-Williams, C., Liu, L., Mani, N., Marino, C., Mastroberardino, M., Mateu, V., Noble, C., Orena, A. J.,\u00a0 Polka, L., Potter, C. E., Schreiner, M. S., Singh, L., Soderstrom, M., Sundara, M.,\u00a0 Waddell, C., Werker, J., F., Wermelinger & Tsui, A. S.-M. (2021). A multi-lab study of bilingual infants: Exploring the preference for infant-directed speech.<\/a> Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Faytak, M., Liu, S. & Sundara, M. (2020). Nasal coda neutralization in Shanghai Mandarin: Articulatory and perceptual evidence<\/a>. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology.<\/p>\n

J. Schneider,\u00a0L. Perkins, & N. H. Feldman (2020). \u201cA Noisy Channel Model for Systematizing Unpredictable Input Variation<\/a>.\u201d M. M Brown & A. Kohut (eds.),\u00a0Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development<\/em>: 533-547.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Ward, N., Conboy, B., & Kuhl., P.K. (2020)\u00a0Exposure to a second language in infancy alters speech production<\/a>.\u00a0Bilingualism: Language and Cognition<\/em>,\u00a0<\/em>1-14.<\/p>\n

The ManyBabies Consortium (2020). Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed speech preference.<\/a>\u00a0Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science<\/em>,\u00a03<\/em> (1), 24-52.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins & J. Lidz (2020). \u201cFiller-gap dependency comprehension at 15 months: The role of vocabulary<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0Language Acquisition<\/em>, 27(1): 98-115.<\/p>\n

2010 – 2019<\/h2>\n

Yang, M,\u00a0&\u00a0Sundara, M. (2019) Cue-shifting between acoustic cues:<\/a> Evidence for directional asymmetry.\u00a0Journal of Phonetics, 75,\u00a0<\/i>27-42.<\/p>\n

Mateu, V. E. & Hyams, N. (2019). On the learnability of implicit arguments.<\/a> In Ionin, T. & Rispoli, M. (eds.) Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research\u00a0[LALD 63]<\/em>. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.<\/p>\n

Chong, A., & Vicenik, C. &\u00a0Sundara, M.\u00a0(2018).\u00a0Intonation plays a role in language discrimination in infancy<\/a>.\u00a0Infancy, 23<\/i>(6), 795-819.<\/p>\n

J. Lidz &\u00a0L. Perkins\u00a0(2018). \u201cThe importance of input representations<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism<\/em>, 8(6): 743-748.<\/p>\n

J. Lidz &\u00a0L. Perkins\u00a0(2018). \u201cLanguage Acquisition<\/a>.\u201d J. Wixted (ed.),\u00a0The Stevens\u2019 Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience<\/em>, Fourth Edition, Volume 4.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M. & Mateu, V. (2018). Lexical stress constrains English-learning infants’ segmentation in a non-native language<\/a>. Cognition\u00a0<\/em>181. 105-116.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N. H., Onario, G. M., Morgan, J. L., & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants\u2019 discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts<\/a>.\u00a0Cognition<\/em>,\u00a0178<\/em>, 57\u201366.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.05.009<\/a><\/p>\n

Sundara, M.\u00a0(2018). Why do children pay more attention to grammatical morphemes at the ends of sentences?<\/a>\u00a0Journal of Child Language,\u00a0<\/em>45(3),\u00a0<\/em>703-716.<\/p>\n

Mateu, V., Hyams, N. & Winans, L. (2018). Intervention effects in early grammar: Evidence from sluicing<\/a>.\u00a0Proceedings of\u00a0the 42nd Boston University Conference on Language Development\u00a0[BUCLD 42].<\/em>\u00a0 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins & J. Lidz (2018). \u201cBehavioral Acquisition Methods with Infants<\/a>.\u201d J. Sprouse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Syntax<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Mateu,\u00a0Victoria\u00a0E.\u00a0(2017). What cross-linguistic acquisition differences can tell us about invisible syntax: The case of Spanish ‘parecer’.<\/a> Proceedings of\u00a0the\u00a041st Boston University Conference on Language Development\u00a0[BUCLD 41]<\/em>.\u00a0Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.<\/p>\n

Hyams, N., Mateu, V. & Winans, L. (2017). Ellipsis meets wh-movement: Sluicing in early grammar<\/a>. In\u00a0LaCara, N.; Moulton, K.; & Tessier, A-M. (eds.)\u00a0A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson<\/em>.\u00a0Linguistics Open Access Publications. 1.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins, N.H. Feldman, & J. Lidz (2017). \u201cLearning an Input Filter for Argument Structure Acquisition<\/a>.\u201d\u00a0Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics.<\/em><\/p>\n

Polka, L., Orena, A.J.,\u00a0Sundara, M.,\u00a0& Worrall, J. (2017). Segmenting words from fluent speech in infancy: Challenges and opportunities in the bilingual context<\/a>.\u00a0Developmental Science<\/em>\u00a0Jan;20(1). doi: 10.1111\/desc.12419. Epub 2016 May 4.<\/p>\n

Hendrickson, K. &\u00a0Sundara, M.\u00a0(2017).\u00a0Fourteen-month-olds’ decontextualized understanding of words for absent objects<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Child Language, 44(1),\u00a0<\/em>239-254.<\/p>\n

L. Perkins, N. H. Feldman, & J. Lidz. (2017). Learning an Input Filter for Argument Structure<\/a>
\nAcquisition. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational
\nLinguistics.<\/p>\n

Polka, L., Orena, A.J., Sundara, M., & Worrall, J. (2016).\u00a0Segmenting words from fluent speech in infancy: Challenges and opportunities in the bilingual context<\/a>.\u00a0Developmental Science<\/em>\u00a0May 4 doi: 10.1111\/desc.12419<\/p>\n

Hendrickson, K.\u00a0&\u00a0Sundara, M. (2016).\u00a0Fourteen month-olds’ decontextualized understanding of words for absent objects<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Child Language\u00a0<\/em>Jan 19: 1-16<\/p>\n

Chong, A.J.\u00a0& Sundara, M. (2016). Perceptual similarity modulates online compensation for phonological variation<\/a>.\u00a0Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Phonology 2.<\/em><\/p>\n

Mateu,\u00a0Victoria\u00a0E.\u00a0&\u00a0Nina\u00a0Hyams. (2016).\u00a0One\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0loneliest\u00a0number:\u00a0The acquisition of Spanish indefinite \u2018un\u2019.<\/a>\u00a0Proceedings of the Generativist Approaches to Language Acquisition: North America 6\u00a0[GALANA 6]<\/em>.\u00a0Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Molnar, M., Frota, S. (2015). The perception of boundary tones in infancy<\/a>. Presented at ICPhS, Glasgow.<\/em>Published In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.),\u00a0Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences<\/em>. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. Paper number 361, 1-4.<\/p>\n

Adani, F., Scutellaro, A., Sundara, M., & Hyams, N. (2015).\u00a0Online processing of subject and object relative clauses in adults and infants<\/a>. In Kern, S., Chenu, F., & Gayraud, F. (Eds.)\u00a0The<\/em>\u00a0role of input in language acquisition.<\/em>\u00a0Cambridge Scholar Publishing.<\/p>\n

Chong, A.J., & Sundara, M. (2015).\u00a018-month-olds compensate for a phonological alternation<\/a>. Presented & Published in Grillo, E., & Jepson, K. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 39th<\/sup>\u00a0annual\u00a0Boston University Conference on Language Development,\u00a0<\/em>113-126.<\/p>\n

Kim, Y. J., & Sundara, M. (2015).\u00a0Segmentation of vowel-initial words is facilitated by function words<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Child Language,\u00a0<\/em>42(4), 709-733.<\/p>\n

White, J., & Sundara, M. (2014).\u00a0Biased generalization of newly learned phonological alternations by 12-month-old infants<\/a>.\u00a0Cognition, 133(1)<\/em>, 85-90.<\/p>\n

Nazzi, T., Mersad, K., Sundara, M., Lakimova, G., & Polka, L. (<\/span>2014). Early word segmentation in infants acquiring Parisian French: task dependent and dialect specific aspects<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Child Language, 41(3),\u00a0<\/i>600-633.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yu, K., Khan, S.D., & Sundara, M. (2014).\u00a0Intonational phonology in Bengali and English infant-directed speech<\/a>. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon & D. Hirst (Eds.)\u00a0Proceedings of Speech Prosody<\/em>\u00a07<\/em>. 1130-1133.<\/p>\n

Vicenik, C. & Sundara, M. (2013).\u00a0The role of rhythm and intonation in language and dialect discrimination by adults<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Phonetics, 41(5),\u00a0<\/em>297-306.<\/p>\n

Polka, L., & Sundara, M. (2012).\u00a0Word segmentation in monolingual infants acquiring Canadian-English and Canadian-French: Native language, cross-language and cross-dialect comparisons<\/a>.\u00a0Infancy 17(2),\u00a0<\/em>198-232. doi: 10.1111\/j.1532-7078.2011.00075.x<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., & Scutellaro, A. (2011).\u00a0Rhythmic distance between languages affects the development of speech perception in bilingual infants<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Phonetics, 39(4),\u00a0<\/em>505-513.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Demuth, K. & Kuhl, P.K. (2011).\u00a0Sentence-position effects on children’s comprehension & production of English 3rd<\/sup>\u00a0person singular –s<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 54,\u00a0<\/em>55-71.<\/p>\n

1998 – 2009<\/h2>\n

Song, J. Y., Sundara, M., & Demuth, K. (2009).\u00a0Effects of phonology on children’s production of English 3rd<\/sup>\u00a0person singular –s<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 52(3),\u00a0<\/em>623-642.<\/em><\/p>\n

Ilari, B., &\u00a0Sundara, M.\u00a0(2009). Music listening preferences in early life: Infants\u2019 response to accompanied versus unaccompanied singing<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of Research in Music Education, 56,\u00a0<\/i>357-369. doi: 10.1177\/0022429408329107<\/i><\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Molnar, M. (2008).\u00a0Development of coronal stop perception: Bilingual infants keep pace with their monolingual peers<\/a>. Cognition, 108,\u00a0<\/em>232-242.<\/em><\/p>\n

Sundara, M., & Polka, L. (2008).\u00a0Discrimination of coronal stops by bilingual adults: The timing and nature of language interaction<\/a>.\u00a0Cognition, 106(1)<\/em>, 234-258.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Polka, L. & Baum, S. (2006).\u00a0Production of coronal stops by adult simultaneous bilinguals<\/a>.\u00a0Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1)<\/em>, 97-114.<\/em><\/p>\n

Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Genesee, F. (2006).\u00a0Language-experience facilitates discrimination of \/d- <\/a>\u00f0<\/a>\/ in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of English<\/a>.\u00a0Cognition, 100(2)<\/em>, 369-388.<\/em><\/p>\n

Sundara, M. (2005).\u00a0Acoustic-phonetics of coronal stops: A cross-language study of Canadian English & Canadian French<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of the Acoustical Society of America<\/em>,\u00a0118(2)<\/em>, 1026-1037.<\/p>\n

Sundara, M. (2003). Can adult phonetic categories be predicted from statistical distribution alone?<\/a> Presented at ICPhS, Barcelona Aug 3-9th<\/sup>. Published in Sol, M. J., Recasens, D., Romero, J. (Eds.)\u00a0Proceedings of the 15th<\/sup>\u00a0International Congress of Phonetic Sciences<\/em>, 2329-2332.<\/p>\n

Polka, L. & Sundara, M. (2003).\u00a0Word segmentation in monolingual and bilingual infant learners of English and French<\/a>. Presented at ICPhS, Barcelona Aug 3-9th<\/sup>. Published in Sol, M. J., Recasens, D., Romero, J. (Eds.)\u00a0Proceedings of the 15th<\/sup>International Congress of Phonetic Sciences<\/em>, 1021-1024.<\/p>\n

Polka, L., Colantonio, C. & Sundara, M. (2001). Cross-language perception of \/d \u2013 \u00f0\/: Evidence for a new developmental pattern<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5)<\/em>, 2190-2200.<\/p>\n

Aravind, N., Saoji, A., & Sundara, M. (1998). Frequency specificity of the medial efferent system. In Pardasani, K. R. (Ed.), Advances in Biomechanics: Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference. MACT Press, Bhopal<\/em>, 231-236.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

2020 – Present Perkins, L., Feldman, N. H., & Lidz, J. (2026). \u201cMind the gap: Learning the Surface Forms of movement dependencies.\u201d Language. Perkins, L., Ying, Y., Williams, A., & Lidz, J. (2026). Representations of Nonlocal Syntactic Dependencies Feed Verb Learning in Infancy. Developmental Science. Perkins, L., & Hunter, T. (2026). Modeling regularization in language … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Publications”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-625","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=625"}],"version-history":[{"count":52,"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/625\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3497,"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/625\/revisions\/3497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/languagelab.humanities.ucla.edu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}